Drepturi sau privilegii?

After deciding that meat should cost more (well, the people thought it was due to an attempt to revitalize the economy, the government knowing that ecological reasons were behind the decision), a new interesting project has been brought before the authorities:

Tarabostes Decides:
Too Much Yakking, Already, Say Delegation

Government Acts
The Issue
Some people say Tarabostes's policy on free speech has gone too far.

The Debate
"These days, anyone says whatever they want with no regard to what kind of dribble is coming out of their mouths!" says angry commuter Hope Li. "It's gone too far. We should go back to the good old days, when if someone started talking garbage, we'd smack them one."

This is the position your government is preparing to adopt.

"We need more free speech, not less," argues civil rights campaigner Gregory Spirit. "Free speech allows ideas to be explored, challenged, and discussed in a productive, open forum. It teaches our kids to be critical thinkers. And dirty words, of course, but that's just the price you pay."
[Accept]

"The right to free speech is a central tenet of our system of democracy," says religious leader Lars Spirit. "But surely the right to not have your religious beliefs mocked by others is worth something, too? We mustn't put up with intolerance!"
[Accept]

The Government Position
The government has indicated its intention to follow the recommendations of Option 1.